I don't think anyone is using the word "daemonz" to try and offend white people. White people have been pretty pro-evil in their history; all the way down to the common man. "daemonz" seems to me a fairly tame word that sums up the image white people have in a semi-humorous fashion. Pinks, again, is not exactly an offensive term. You are pink, after all. We are called black; even those of us without black skin.
Funny, just a few months ago Petercrouch was an uncle tom. But anyway; the ignorance of common whites is astounding and they are extremely quick to wash 'their' (that is to say, white people as a group) hands of any wrongdoings either in the present or in the past that still affect the present ("they're just blaming whitey") so I'm not surprised there's a growing resentment of whites among blacks. Whites are not responsible for all the pain in Africa today but there's not a single problem in Africa that isn't in some way connected to white people (but according to whites all they did was rescue some blacks from Africa via slavery). A lot of white governments in Africa incurred massive amounts of debt whilst trying to quell the native rebels and in order to be recognised as independent countries once the natives had 'won' they had to agree to take on these debts. Then absurdly high-interest loans were given to countries that had experienced disasters like famine and drought (to this very day for every cent given to Africa in charity, 25 cents leaves Africa to first world countries). Then you have the puppet regimes who whites would keep in power in return for good good good deals on the natural resources. All this did was destabilize unstable countries further. It was not uncommon in various African countries to find both sides of a civil war funded by the same whites.
I don't disagree with this.
These countries have civil wars because they are highly unstable. No one group holds enough power to keep the other parties from trying to usurp them. The abundance of guns being provided to them from whites and Asians(oriental) certainly doesn't help the situation. The tutsi and hutu tribes were set against each other by white people over hundreds of years. The old divide and conquer method. This is an example of pain in Africa that is not caused by white people but is connected to white people. Ideally they would embrace each other as brothers and could easily do so but the psychological conditioning the white man put upon them is so severe and so powerful that they cannot break from it. The slave mentality comes to mind. South Africa and Zimbabwe have spread the wealth that was concentrated in a tiny part of the population (whites) amongst a larger group of blacks. This is not a bad thing as many whites would have you believe. More whites are in poverty in SA then ever before, true, but there are also tenfold more rich blacks than there were before. Poor blacks even have the opportunity to move up in the social classes; a luxury never before given to them.
So when Qaddafi is helping his people and providing them with food and water and using oil money to build infrastructure and buildings the US Government is more than happy to help murder him but when there's somebody like this in power, NOW they want to keep their noses out of other peoples business? If he were spending this money on his people I don't doubt there would be a sudden surge in Islamic suicide bombers in the country and America would need to go in and occupy the country to protect it.
Yes 95% was clearly a made up statistic but it's probably not far from the real figure. Whites are a shadowy bunch and even today we don't REALLY know the full extent of their evil in Africa. But even on the surface it's not too hard to see the negative influence whites have had on the continent (but then we're just blaming whitey).
Yes, countries that are not related to the marauding band of pirates known as Anglo Saxons did not benefit greatly from their plundering of other nations. What I think the brother meant is name me one Anglo Saxon country.
Discrimination towards the poor, innocent white farmers? The ones who were like 7% of the population and controlled 95% of the countries wealth? f*ck them. They had hundreds of years to extend a hand of peace to the native blacks. They didn't ever do it. Hell, I (and most of us) was born while they still had racial segregation.
Hitler wasn't killing the Jews to purify his race; he was killing them because they owned too much (some say they were jut a scapegoat but even after Hitler started losing the war he was still pumping tons of money into killing Jews, that's dedication reserved for no scapegoat).
I wouldn't say slavery is the reason Africa is the way it is, I would say it was the colonisation and land grab that made Africa the way it is. From when I can see more of my peoples treasures in British museums than I can in any African country you know we got raped by more than our own civil wars (created by whites anyway).
